Desenvolvimento das forças produtivas e emancipação humana
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to indicate the relation between development of productive forces and human emancipation. The argument is grounded in the expansion of human capabilities as a criterion to define a higher stage of development of productive forces rather than increased productivity, despite being a pre‐condition for human emancipation. I argue that the increases in productivity and expansion of human capabilities are not in an immediate relation, in the first place due to underdetermination of technology and secondly because the increases in productivity are just a manifestation of the contradictory process of expansion of human capabilities. I conclude that there is an intrinsic link between development of productive forces and human emancipation, and that therefore an element of the constitution of the 'realm of freedom' is the qualitative change of the productive forces.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Desde que se atribua crédito ao/à criador/a original, a licença permite que outras pessoas usem, façam adaptações e compartilhem a obra para fins não comerciais. Isso significa que o uso da obra não pode ser feito visando auferir rendimento comercial.
References
BLOCH, Marc. “Advento e conquista do moinho d’agua.”, In: GAMA, R. (org.) História da técnica e da tecnologia: textos básicos. São Paulo: Editora da USP, 1985.
BUKHARIN, Nikolai. Historical Materialism: a system of sociology. New York: International Publishers, 1925.
COHEN, Gerald A. Karl Marx’s theory of history: a defence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
FEENBERG, Andrew. “Marxism and the critique of social rationality: from surplus value to the politics of technology.”, Cambridge Journal of Economics. v. 34, 2010, pp. 37-49.
FINLEY, Moses I. The Ancient Economy. 2a Ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
GORZ, André. Adeus ao proletariado. Para além do socialismo. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 1987.
KIRSH, David A.”The Eletric Car and the Burden of History: Studies in the Automotive Systems Rivalry in America, 1890-1996.”, Bussines and Economic History, vol. 26, nº 2, 1997.
LUKÁCS, György. Ontologia Del Ser Social: El Trabajo. Buenos Aires: Herramienta, 2004.
MAC INTYRE, Alasdair. A Short History of Ethics. New York: Touchstone, 1996.
MARX, Karl. Grundrisse. São Paulo: Boitempo/UFRJ, 2011.
________. Para a Crítica da Economia Politica. Manuscrito de 1861-1863 (Cadernos I a V). Belo Horizonte, Autêntica, 2010.
________. O Capital. Critica da Economia Politica. Livro I. O processo de Produção do Capital. 2 Volumes. Série Os Economistas. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1996.
________. A Miséria da Filosofia . São Paulo: Global, 1985.
________. O Capital. Critica da Economia Politica. Livro III O processo Global de Produção Capitalista. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1981.
MARX, Karl & Friedrich Engels. A Ideologia Alemã: Feuerbach. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1987.
MEDEIROS, João Leonardo G. “The values of the world against the ‘world’ of values: Practical contradictions of economic theories of ‘welfare’.”, Journal of Critical Realism. Vol. 4, No 1 (2005), pp. 62- 88.
MORRIS, William. Notícias de lugar nenhum. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2002.
NOBLE, David F. Forces of Production; A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf, 1984.
OHNO, Taiichi. O Sistema Toyota de Produção. Além da Produção em Larga Escala. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 1997.
SAYERS, Sean. “Freedom and the “Realm of Necessity’’ “, In: MOGGACH, Douglas (ed.) The Left-Hegelians: New Philosophical and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 261-74.
________. Marxism and Human Nature. London: Routledge, 1998.